Analysis Of The Black Cat And Frankenstein - 1750 Words

In horror, the most fascinating and complex relationship is found between the protagonist and the â€Å"other.† The protagonist is the leading or major character in a literary work. They are at the centre of the story, make the major decisions and therefore suffer the consequences of those decisions. In an era of racial tension and ever growing disparity between the wealthy and poor, horror seems to use these powerless groups in its narratives. These groups are called the â€Å"other.† The â€Å"other† are those who do not have the power of the establishment or those with less power. They are repressed and forced into submission by the establishment. This creates conflict as the marginalized â€Å"other† seek to change the system to benefit them. Two great literary works that illustrate the dynamic between protagonist and â€Å"other† are The Black Cat and Frankenstein. In The Black Cat the protagonist is an unnamed man who abuses his cat representi ng the â€Å"other† in his life. Gouging out his cats eye and hanging his cat ends up brining about his demise at the hands of the â€Å"other.† This demise is the result of the cat becoming part of the establishment and the narrator moving away from it. The iconic novel Frankenstein tells the story of the protagonist, Victor Frankenstein and his relationship with the monster he creates, representing the â€Å"other.† The consequences of Frankenstein pushing the monster away from civilization and treating it like Satan end up killing Frankenstein and those he lovesShow MoreRelatedHorror Genre Dissertation6741 Words   |  27 PagesCabinet of Dr Caligari (1919) and F.W.Murnau’s Nosferatu (1922). In the 1930’s production was being dominated in Hollywood. The films being created took influence from the German Expressionism era and put real focus on the villain as a monster. Frankenstein in 1931 by James Whale and Tod Browning’s Dracula also in 1931 were the main films out at the time made by Universal Pictures. These films are often used to prove the link between horror and the relatively respectable tradition of Gothic literatureRead MoreMasculinity in Chuck Palahniuks Work7062 Words   |  29 PagesMachiavellian and self-serving wars, have rendered men yearning for integral and worthy of emulation, male role models.2   Mendieta’s analysis of Palahniuk’s work takes a very direct approach in margining masculinity in crisis, directly blaming culture itself. I believe that Palahniuk’s characters are not victims of society’s emasculating effects, but subject to their own self-analysis.   What truly interests Palahniuk is the nature of man in response to this.   Palahniuk’s concern is not that men are no longerRead MoreLogical Reasoning189930 Words   |  760 Pageslooking at alternative actions that can be taken, then considering the probable good consequences of each action and the probable bad consequences while weighing the positive and negative impact of each consequence. It’s a kind of cost-benefit analysis. Exercises 1. Columbus Day is an American holiday. Write a short essay that weighs the pros and cons and then comes to a decision about whether there should be more or less public celebration (by Americans and their institutions) on ColumbusRead MoreMetz Film Language a Semiotics of the Cinema PDF100902 Words   |  316 PagesPhenomenology of the Narrative, 16 II Problems of Film Semiotics Chapter 3. Chapter 4. Chapter 5. The Cinema: Language or Language System? 31 Some Points in the Semiotics of the Cinema, 92 Problems of Denotation in the Fiction Film, 108 III Syntagmatic Analysis of the Image Track Chapter 6. Outline of the Autonomous Segments in Jacques Rozier s film Adieu Philippine, 149 Chapter 7. Syntagmatic Study of Jacques Rozier s Film Adieu Philippine, 177 vii viii CONTENTS IV The Modern Cinema: Some Theoretical

WRSP 510 Book Review Paper - 5258 Words

Kurt Anderson Book Report WRSP 510 Biblical Foundations of Worship (On Line) Mathena, G., One Thing Needful. Chapter 1: One Thing Needful Summary: In Mathena’s insight into the story of Mary and Martha he observes, what I will call the three C’s, in Martha. This story illustrates Martha’s â€Å"commendable† act as she desires to serve Christ as she wanted this meal â€Å"to be her very best.† Her actions are also, â€Å"condemnable†, as her activity takes priority over her relationship with Christ. Lastly, there is contempt in her heart towards Mary in her perceived poor choice. The warning Mathena is really driving home is to the believer’s posture before the Lord, in terms of our â€Å"busyness†. â€Å"Spiritual busyness and misplaced priorities† are his†¦show more content†¦Analysis: It seems that Mathena is thorough in finding his conclusion that we are created, commanded and called to worship. I am more than intrigued as he considered, particularly Moses, physical appearance following his mountain top experience. One’s physical appearance can be an indication of what is on the inside, especially their face and body language. And one’s countenance is a sure tell of what is deep inside. Just as Mathena described Moses, Jesus, and Stephan and their appearance as they were in the Lord’s presence, you can see it some believers today. I chose the word â€Å"some† very intentionally. I am not at all convinced that the majority of those who name the name of Jesus have a clear understanding of God’s command and call to worship Him. When you ask many, â€Å"Why were you created?† the answer usually has to do with an occupation, family, good works, etc. In truth, there is not a clear understanding that they are created in the image of their maker for the expressed intent to worship to their and His delight. What I have learned: Worship is not what I do, but who I am in the Lord. Chapter 3: Worship’s Procedure: Theology of Worship Summary: Mathena discusses a right theology of worship in terms of balance, basic and biblical. The big question or concern that is initially raised is simply the correct concern that â€Å"many Christians today know very little, if anything, of

Typography Review Essay Example For Students

Typography: Review Essay The Object Will be 4 inches over and 6 inches down. 5. The black square in the proxy indicates that you have made the center of your elected rectangle the reference point 6. The key you should press to push text from one column to the next is Enter on the number keypad. 7. A red plus sign in the out port of a text frame indicates it is the oversee symbol and means there is more text than the frame will hold. 8. CTR+OPTED 9. CTR*S 10. Draw rectangle*A 11. CTR+I 12, CTR+TTL+P 13. CTR+2 14 CTR+D 15. CTR+B 16, CTR+I 17. CTR+P 18, The steps for proportionately enlarging a graphic inside a frame are: Toggle between the container and the content, scale the image inside the frame without hanging the frame size, rotate the image inside the frame, center the image inside the frame, fill frame proportionately, and fit the frame to the content. I g. The process for deleting oversee text without changing the size of the type or the text frame is to place the cursor at the end of the visible copy, press release those keys, and then press delete. 20. The process for unlinking text frames is to select the frame in the middle of your text thread, double-click on the in port or the out port, the text flow Will be cut Off at the in port and there will be a text overflow symbol.

Animal Farm compared to the Russian Revolution Essay Example For Students

Animal Farm compared to the Russian Revolution Essay All of the characters in Animal farm have counterparts in real life. This book was based on the Russian Revolution, and all the important populace of the revolution are symbolized. Some of the animals represent individuals in the Russian Revolution, and some types of animals represent different types of Russian citizens. The book carries out much like the actual revolution. It starts out with hopes of an empire where all are equal and the unfair unjust leader is thrown out. Then it moves on to where some individuals begin to take more power than is rightfully theirs. At the end the rulers have completely taken over and the kingdom is as it was under the original rulers. I will compare the animals from top of the social class to the bottom. At the top were the pigs. Each pig represented someone different in the revolution. Old Major is compared to Lenin. He was an ideologist who dreamed up a wonderful government where all the animals were equal and the humans, or the czars, were pushed out. Unfortunately his dream would never materialize. Then we are left with his predecessors. The first is Snowball. Snowball believed one hundred percent in Old Majors ideals. He wanted all the things Old Major wanted, such as the welfare of the animals. In the Russian Revolution his counterpart would be Trotsky. Trotsky believed and wanted the same things as Lenin, and wanted to continue what Lenin had started. Then comes Napoleon. Napoleon was selfish and greedy. He did not want to share the power or the decision making with any other individual. This was the same for Stalin. At first Napoleon and Snowball shared the decision making and had debates about what course of action they would take. This worked for awhile. Then Napoleon grew weary of long debates, and he thought he could make the decision by himself. He then forced Snowball out of the farm and started to spread lies about Snowball to get the entire farm against him. Stalin did the same thing against Trotsky and forced Trotsky into hiding into Mexico, where he was eventually assassinated. Both Stalin and Napoleon ruined any hopes of equal and fare government and instead set up dictatorships. Then comes the final important pig, Squealer. Squealer did not make the decisions in the government but acted more like the controlled media as in the Russian government. His job was to influence the people by exaggerating and re-writing history and sometimes telling plain lies all together. The people would listen to him, and he would always listen to Napoleon. Other animals were the worker class type citizens. The types of citizens range from hard working to selfish and lazy. Molly, for instance, only cared about her ribbons, and wasnt much of a thinker. All she wanted to do was eat sugar, and look pretty. Benjamin was a critic who always said Ive seen that before and Itll never work. The cat was just plain lazy, and was always disappearing whenever work had to be done. The ducks were weak and did not get much done. Then there were other donkeys which worked much harder and never thought of their own needs. The pigeons acted as message carriers spreading propaganda between farms, spreading Napoleons words from farm to farm, or in the actual Russian Revolution, country to country. Although all these animals are very different, they all shared one common trait. They were all weak. They all let Napoleon take over without much resistance. Just like Stalin took over Russia. These animals were too weak, too scared, or just lacked the intelligence required to do something about it. This is where it is the fault of the people. They should have stood up to Napoleon for what they fought for in the first place. .u4149d02f66424f30e4b90157dbca777b , .u4149d02f66424f30e4b90157dbca777b .postImageUrl , .u4149d02f66424f30e4b90157dbca777b .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .u4149d02f66424f30e4b90157dbca777b , .u4149d02f66424f30e4b90157dbca777b:hover , .u4149d02f66424f30e4b90157dbca777b:visited , .u4149d02f66424f30e4b90157dbca777b:active { border:0!important; } .u4149d02f66424f30e4b90157dbca777b .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .u4149d02f66424f30e4b90157dbca777b { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .u4149d02f66424f30e4b90157dbca777b:active , .u4149d02f66424f30e4b90157dbca777b:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .u4149d02f66424f30e4b90157dbca777b .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .u4149d02f66424f30e4b90157dbca777b .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .u4149d02f66424f30e4b90157dbca777b .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .u4149d02f66424f30e4b90157dbca777b .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .u4149d02f66424f30e4b90157dbca777b:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .u4149d02f66424f30e4b90157dbca777b .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .u4149d02f66424f30e4b90157dbca777b .u4149d02f66424f30e4b90157dbca777b-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .u4149d02f66424f30e4b90157dbca777b:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: Frees - Animal Farm Animal Farm EssayThe people must stand up to those who would destroy the system or else all is lost. I think that this story was a good representation of the actual Russian Revolution. But it is even more than that. It shows how people can let certain individuals get away with anything just because they do not feel like standing up to them. If you tried, this story could also be compared to other times in history when the people let dictatorships form in their own country. I enjoyed this book a lot but I do not think that it should be just compared to the Russian Revolution.